Antipyretic and Anti-oxidant potential of Hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgeris

 

Mateshwari M. Banwale*, Disha Chaouhan, Manjeet Singh, Rajesh Mujariya, Priya Bisen

Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Research (IPSR), Sardar Patel University, Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: bhardwaj.mahi.mahi@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

G. vulgaris Nees of the family Apocynaceae is a medium sized tree grown in semishade or no shade and is common in the Ernad and Nilambur taluks of Kerala. Various parts of this plant have been used in the treatment of ulcers, sores, inflammation, dyspepsia, healing of wounds, etc. The present study aimed at the evaluation of anti-pyretic activity of the hydroalcoholic extracts of the leaves by in vivo methods. Phytochemical screening reveals the presences of Alkaloids, Saponins, Carbohydrates, Flavonoids and Phenols. The total phenolic content was found 0.691mg/100mg of dry weight of extract, expressed as gallic acid equivalents and the total flavonoid content was found 0.847mg/100mg, expressed as Quercetin equivalents.  Antioxidant activity was performed using DPPH method. The IC50 value of Hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgaris was found to be 55.79µg/ml. Yeast induced pyrxia and anti-pyretic property of hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris. The effect of hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris were determined after administration at two dose levels (100 and 200 mg/kg b.w.) in yeast induced pyrxia rats. From the results, it may be concluded that hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris possess significant anti-pyretic effect may be due to the effect of antioxidants and constituent present in the leaves.

 

KEYWORDS: G. vulgaris Nees, Phytochemical screening, Anti-pyretic, Hydroalcoholic extract, TPC, TFC.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Ayurvedic medicines mainly based on plants enjoy a respective position today, especially in the developing countries, where modern health services are limited. Safe effective and inexpensive indigenous remedies are gaining popularity among the people of both urban and rural areas especially in India and China. Information from ethnic groups or indigenous traditional medicines has played vital role in the discovery of novel products from plants as chemotherapeutic agents.

 

Herbal medicines have been main source of primary healthcare in all over the world. From ancient times, plants have been catering as rich source of effective and safe medicines. About 80% of world populations are still dependent on traditional medicines. Herbal medicines are finished, labeled medicinal products that contain as active ingredients, aerial or underground part of plants or other plant materials, or combination thereof, whether in the crude state or as plant preparations. Medicines containing plant materials combined with chemically defined active substances, including chemically defined isolated constituents of plants are not considered to be herbal medicines1.

 

Pyrexia or fever is caused as a secondary impact of infection, malignancy or other diseased states. It is the body's natural defense to create an environment where infectious agent or damaged tissue cannot survive. Normally the infected or damaged tissue initiates the enhanced formation of proinflammatory mediator's (Cytokines like interleukin 1β, α, β and TNF- α), which increase the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PG E2) near peptic hypothalamus area and thereby triggering the hypothalamus to elevate the body temperature2. As the temperature regulatory system is governed by a nervous feedback mechanism, so when body temperature becomes very high, it dilate the blood vessels and increasing sweating to reduce the temperature; but when the body temperature become very low hypothalamus protect the internal temperature by vasoconstriction. High fever often increases faster disease progression by increasing tissue catabolism, dehydration and existing complaints, as found in HIV3. Drugs having anti-inflammatory activity generally possess antipyretic activity (e.g) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It has been suggested that prostaglandin (PGE) mediates pyrogen fever; the ability of NSAIDs, to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis could help to explain their antipyretic activity.

 

According to Ayurveda, pyrexia originates from a combination of indigestion, seasonal variations and significant alterations in daily routine4. Due to poor hygiene practices and malnutrition, children in developing countries frequently suffer from various forms of infections which present as fevers. These fevers are often accompanied by aches and pains which all lead to morbidity and mortality5.

 

Antipyretics are drugs which can reduce elevated body temperature. Regulation of body temperature requires a delicate balance between production and loss of heat, and the hypothalamus which regulate the set point of body temperature. Drugs like paracetamol do not influence body temperature when elevated by factors such as exercise or increase in ambient temperature6.

 

Antipyretics have been shown to suppress fever by inhibiting prostaglandin synthetase, resulting in the blockade of the synthesis of prostaglandin in the brain or suppressing the rise of interleukin-1α production subsequent to interferon production Flavanoids like baicalin have been shown to exert antipyretic effect by suppressing TNF-α7 and its related compounds also exhibit inhibition of arachidonic acid peroxidation, which results in reduction of prostaglandin levels thus reducing the fever and pain8.

 

Various injuries and diseases are most often presented with pain and fever. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed drugs for their management but significant gastrointestinal complications like perforation, bleeding, peptic ulcers, and obstructions have limited their uses in clinical settings. Selective COX-2 inhibitors have some benefits on lowering such side effects while risk of cardiovascular adverse events demands important consideration. The social abuse and other side effects like psychological dependency, addiction, tolerance, sedation, constipation, and respiratory depression associated with narcotic analgesics are playing negative role in management of chronic pain and sometimes being inadequate.

 

G. vulgaris Nees of the family Apocynaceae is a medium sized tree grown in semishade or no shade and is common in the Ernad and Nilambur taluks of Kerala. Various parts of this plant have been used in the treatment of ulcers, sores, inflammation, dyspepsia, healing of wounds, etc. The present study aimed at the evaluation of anti-pyretic activity of the hydroalcoholic extracts of the leaves by in vivo methods.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Materials:

All the chemicals used in this study were obtained from Hi Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India), Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI, USA), SD Fine-Chem Ltd. (Mumbai, India) and SRL Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). All the chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade.

 

Methods:

Extraction procedure:

Following procedure was adopted for the preparation of extract from the shade dried and powdered herbs9-10:

 

Defatting of plant material:

Leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris was shade dried at room temperature. The shade dried plant material was coarsely powdered and subjected to extraction with petroleum ether by soxhlet extraction. The extraction was continued till the defatting of the material had taken place.

 

Extraction by maceration process:

46.85gm of dried powdered leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris has been extracted with hydroalcoholic solvent (ethanol:water, 80:20v/v) using soxhlet extraction process for 24-48 hrs, filtered and dried using vacuum evaporator at 40ºC.

 

Determination of percentage yield:

The percentage yield of each extract was calculated by using following formula:

 

                                          Weight of Extract

Percentage yield = --------------------------------------- x100

                               Weight of powder drug taken

 

Phytochemical Screening:

Phytochemical screening: Phytochemical examinations were carried out for all the extracts as per the standard methods.

1. Detection of alkaloids:

Extracts were dissolved individually in dilute Hydrochloric acid and filtered.

 

Mayer’s Test:

Filtrates were treated with Mayer’s reagent (Potassium Mercuric Iodide). Formation of a yellow coloured precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids.

 

Wagner’s Test:

Filtrates were treated with Wagner’s reagent (Iodine in Potassium Iodide). Formation of brown/reddish precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids.

 

Dragendroff’s Test:

Filtrates were treated with Dragendroff’s reagent (solution of Potassium Bismuth Iodide). Formation of red precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids.

 

Hager’s Test:

Filtrates were treated with Hager’s reagent (saturated picric acid solution). Presence of alkaloids confirmed by the formation of yellow coloured precipitate.

 

2. Detection of carbohydrates:

Extracts were dissolved individually in 5ml distilled water and filtered. The filtrates were used to test for the presence of carbohydrates.

 

Molisch’s Test:

Filtrates were treated with 2 drops of alcoholic α-naphthol solution in a test tube. Formation of the violet ring at the junction indicates the presence of Carbohydrates.

 

Benedict’s Test:

Filtrates were treated with Benedict’s reagent and heated gently. Orange red precipitate indicates the presence of reducing sugars.

 

Fehling’s Test:

Filtrates were hydrolysed with dil. HCl, neutralized with alkali and heated with Fehling’s A and B solutions. Formation of red precipitate indicates the presence of reducing sugars.

 

3. Detection of glycosides:

Extracts were hydrolysed with dil. HCl, and then subjected to test for glycosides.

 

Legal’s Test:

Extracts were treated with sodium nitropruside in pyridine and sodium hydroxide. Formation of pink to blood red colour indicates the presence of cardiac glycosides.

 

4. Detection of saponins:

Froth Test:

Extracts were diluted with distilled water to 20ml and this was shaken in a graduated cylinder for 15 minutes. Formation of 1cm layer of foam indicates the presence of saponins.

 

Foam Test:

0.5gm of extract was shaken with 2ml of water. If foam produced persists for ten minutes it indicates the presence of saponins.

 

5. Detection of phenols:

Ferric Chloride Test:

Extracts were treated with 3-4 drops of ferric chloride solution. Formation of bluish black colour indicates the presence of phenols.

 

6. Detection of tannins:

Gelatin Test:

To the extract, 1% gelatin solution containing sodium chloride was added. Formation of white precipitate indicates the presence of tannins.

 

7. Detection of flavonoids:

Alkaline Reagent Test:

Extracts were treated with few drops of sodium hydroxide solution. Formation of intense yellow colour, which becomes colourless on addition of dilute acid, indicates the presence of flavonoids.

 

Lead acetate Test:

Extracts were treated with few drops of lead acetate solution. Formation of yellow colour precipitate indicates the presence of flavonoids.

 

8. Detection of proteins:

Xanthoproteic Test:

The extracts were treated with few drops of conc. Nitric acid. Formation of yellow colour indicates the presence of proteins.

 

9. Detection of diterpenes:

Copper acetate Test:

Extracts were dissolved in water and treated with 3-4 drops of copper acetate solution. Formation of emerald green colour indicates the presence of diterpenes 11.

 

Total Phenolic content estimation:

The total phenolic content of the extract was determined by the modified Folin-Ciocalteu method12. 10 mg Gallic acid was dissolved in 10 ml methanol, various aliquots of 5- 25µg/ml was prepared in methanol. 10mg of dried extracts of were dissolved in 10 ml methanol and filter. Two ml (1mg/ml) of this solution was used for the estimation of phenol.

 

 

2ml of each extract or standard was mixed with 1ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (previously diluted with distilled water 1:10 v/v) and 1ml (7.5g/l) of sodium carbonate. The mixture was vortexed for 15s and allowed to stand for 15 min for colour development. The absorbance was measured at 765nm using a spectrophotometer.

 

Total flavonoids content estimation:

Determination of total flavonoids content was based on aluminium chloride method.  10mg quercetin was dissolved in 10ml methanol, and various aliquots of 5- 25μg/ml were prepared in methanol. 10mg of dried extracts of were dissolved in 10ml methanol and filter. Three ml (1mg/ml) of this solution was used for the estimation of flavonoid. 1ml of 2% AlCl3 methanolic solution was added to 3ml of extract or standard and allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature; absorbance was measured at 420nm13.

 

Antioxidant activity of hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgaris using DPPH method:

DPPH scavenging activity was measured by the spectrophotometer with slightly modification12. Stock solution (6mg in 100ml methanol) was prepared such that 1.5ml of it in 1.5ml of methanol gave an initial absorbance. Decrease in the absorbance in presence of sample extract at different concentration (10- 100 µg/ml) was noted after 15 minutes. 1.5ml of DPPH solution was taken and volume made till 3ml with methanol, absorbance was taken immediately at 517nm for control reading. 1.5ml of DPPH and 1.5ml of the test sample of different concentration were put in a series of volumetric flasks. Absorbance at zero time was taken for each concentration. Final decrease in absorbance was noted of DPPH with the sample at different concentration after 15 minutes at 517nm.

 

The percentage inhibition of free radical DPPH was calculated from the following equation: % inhibition = [(absorbance of control - absorbance of sample)/absorbance of control] × 100%.

 

Antipyretic activity of hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgaris:

Albino Wistar rats of either sex (150–200g) were group housed (n= 6) under a standard 12 h light/dark cycle and controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (25±2 °C, 55–65%). Rats received standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. Animas were acclimatized to laboratory conditions for 7 days before carrying out the experiments. All the experiments were carried in a noise-free room between 08.00 to 15.00 h. Separate group (n=6) of rat was used for each set of experiments. The animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), constituted for the purpose of control and supervision of experimental animals by Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

 

Acute oral toxicity study:

Acute oral toxicity was conducted according to the method of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris (5, 50, 300, and 2000mg/kg) was administered orally for 4 days of six groups of rats (n=6) and the animals were kept under observation for mortality as well as any behavioral changes for evaluation of a possible anti-pyretic activity. Body weights of the animals were recorded and they were randomly divided into 5 groups of 6 animals each as follows:

 

Group Ι served as normal

Group ΙΙ served as control- animals were treated with yeast via subcutaneous injection (10ml/kg).

Group ΙΙΙ animals were administered with yeast (10 ml/kg) and the standard drug paracetamol (150mg/kg b.w.), orally

Group IV animals were administered with yeast (10ml/kg,) and with hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris (100mg/kg b.w.), orally

Group V animals were administered with yeast (10ml/kg,) and with hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris (200mg/kg b.w.), orally.

 

Yeast induced pyrxia:

Pyrexia was induced by subcutaneous injection of 20% w/v of brewer’s yeast (10ml/kg) in distilled water. Basal rectal temperature was measured before the injection of yeast, by inserting digital clinical thermometer to a depth of 2cm into the rectum. The rise in rectal temperature was recorded 19 h after yeast injection. Paracetamol 150mg/kg body weight was used as the standard antipyretic drug. Rectal temperature of animals was noted at regular intervals following the respective treatments. The temperature was measured at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd hour after drug administration13.

 

Statistical analysis:

The values were expressed as mean±SEM (n=6). The statistical significance was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test and P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.001 were considered to be statistically significant.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Herbal medications produced from plant extracts are rapidly being used to treat a wide range of clinical illnesses, despite the fact that little is known about their mechanism of action14. For the field of modern medical science, the herbal drugs are to be subjected for several processes such as identifications, isolation, purification, characterization, structural elucidation and therapeutic evaluation. The strategy of bioassay guided fractionation and isolation using chromatographic separation techniques revolutionized what could be achieved in medicinal plant research15.

 

Medicinal plants have bioactive compounds which are used to curing of various diseases. In this present investigation involves Gendarussa vulgaris medicinal plant was studied. The Hydroalcoholic extract was subjected to qualitative phytochemical screening using standard procedure. Phytochemical screening reveals the presences of Alkaloids, Saponins, Carbohydrates, Flavonoids and Phenols. The total phenolic content was found 0.691mg/100mg of dry weight of extract, expressed as gallic acid equivalents and the total flavonoid content was found 0.847mg/100mg, expressed as Quercetin equivalents.  Antioxidant activity was performed using DPPH method. The IC50 value of Hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgaris was found to be 55.79µg/ml.

 

A natural antipyretic agent with reduced or no toxicity is therefore, essential. Since antipyretic activity is commonly mentioned as a characteristic of drugs or compounds, which have an inhibitory activity on prostaglandins biosynthesis, the yeast induced hyperpyrexia in rat model was employed to investigate the antipyretic activity of the extract. Yeast induced pyrexia is called pathogenic fever which is due to the production of prostaglandins (PGE2) which set the thermoregulatory center at a higher temperature. The hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgaris leaves had a more dramatic impact in reducing hyperthermia than the aqueous extract, but after the 3 hr of treatment, it was shown to have a similar effect as the conventional medication Paracetamol. The extracts are likely to reduce pyrexia by reducing brain concentration of prostaglandin E2 especially in the hypothalamus through its action on COX-3 or by enhancement of the production of the body’s own antipyretic substances like vasopressin and arginine.

 

Antipyretics have been shown to suppress fever by inhibiting prostaglandin synthetase, resulting in the blockade of the synthesis of prostaglandin in the brain or suppressing the rise of interleukin-1α production subsequent to interferon production Flavanoids like baicalin have been shown to exert antipyretic effect by suppressing TNF-α (Adesokan et al., 2008) and its related compounds also exhibit inhibition of arachidonic acid peroxidation, which results in reduction of prostaglandin levels thus reducing the fever and pain. This study also correlates with the study of Zakaria et al., (2007) that the compounds like flavonoids and saponins are suggested to act synergistically to exert the observed pharmacological activity. The results of present study indicate that the hydroalcoholic extract of Gendarussa vulgaris leaves possesses significant antipyretic effect on yeast induced hyperthermia in rats. This may be attributed to the presence of chemical constituents in the extracts which may be involved in inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Also, there are several mediators or multiprocessors underlining the pathogenesis of fever. Inhibition of any of these mediators may bring about antipyresis.

 

Table 1: Total phenolic and total flavonoid content of Gendarussa vulgaris

S. No.

Total Phenol content

(mg/100mg)

Total flavonoid content

(mg/100mg)

1.

0.691

0.847

 

Table 2: % Inhibition of ascorbic acid and Hydroalcoholic extract using DPPH method

S. No.

Concentration

(µg/ml)

% Inhibition

Ascorbic acid

Hydroalcoholic extract

1

10

44.65

26.65

2

20

48.62

34.56

3

40

65.34

42.74

4

60

69.65

51.43

5

80

77.41

62.87

6

100

84.13

70.24

IC 50

17.68

55.79

 

Table 3: Antipyretic activity of hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris against yeast induced pyrxia in rats

Rectal Temperature in °C after 18hrs of Yeast Injection

Group

0 hr

1 hr

2 hr

3 hr

Group Ι

38.00±

0.8

37.00±

0.7

37.50±

0.6

37.40±

0.6

Group ΙI

41.50±

0.11

40.15±

0.15

39.50±

0.13

39.10±

0.12

Group ΙII

40.00±

0.15

38.50±

0.13

38.00±

0.13*

37.50±

0.12*

Group ΙV

40.50±

0.15

39.50±

0.15

39.00±

0.15

38.00±

0.12*

Group V

40.30±

0.15

39.00±

0.14

38.10±

0.14*

37.50±

0.14*

Values expressed as mean ± SEM (n=6) *P<0.05as compared to arthritis Control

 

Figure 1: Antipyretic activity of hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris against yeast induced pyrxia in rats

 

CONCLUSION:

Yeast induced pyrxia and anti-pyretic property of hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris. The effect of hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris were determined after administration at two dose levels (100 and 200mg/kg b.w.) in yeast induced pyrxia rats. From the results, it may be concluded that hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Gendarussa vulgaris possess significant anti-pyretic effect may be due to the effect of antioxidants and constituent present in the leaves. All these biological activities may be said to be a promising findings brought out by the present study. These contributions can be used as parameters for the authentication of plant as well as for developing newer drugs based on their activity. It can be optimistic that the present work suggests an herbal drug of multiple therapeutic advantages and likely to be an anti-pyretic drug. However, further investigation is required to isolate the active constituents responsible for these activities and to elucidate the exact mechanisms of action.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     World Health Organization. Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials. World Health Organization; 1998.

2.     Saper CB, Breder CD. The neurologic basis of fever. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(26):1880-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406303302609, PMID 7832832.

3.     Veugelers PJ, Kaldor JM, Strathdee SA, Page-Shafer KA, Schechter MT, Coutinho RA, Keet IP, van Griensven GJ. Incidence and prognostic significance of symptomatic primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in homosexual men. J Infect Dis. 1997; 176(1):112-7. doi: 10.1086/514012, PMID 9207356.

4.     Gupta M, Shaw BP, Mukerjee A. Studies on antipyretic-analgesic and ulcerogenic activity of polyherbal preparation in rats and mice. Int J Pharmacol. 2008; 4(2):88-94. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2008.88.94.

5.     Igbe I, Ozolua RI, Okpo SO, Obasuyi O. Antipyretic and analgesic effects of the aqueous extract of the fruit pulp of Hunteria umbellata K Schum (Apocynaceae). Trop J Pharm Res. 2009;8(4):331-6. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v8i4.45226.

6.     Gomathi P, Mazumder UK, Gupta M. Antipyretic potential of Galega pupurea root. Int Res J Pharm. 2011;2(11):151-2.

7.     Adesokan AA, Yakubu MT, Owoyele BV, Akanji MA, Soladoye AO, Lawal OK. Effect of administration of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Enantia chlorantha stem bark on brewer’s yeast-induced pyresis in rats. Afr J Biochem Res. 2008;2(7):165-9.

8.     Taïwe GS, Bum EN, Talla E, Dimo T, Weiss N, Sidiki N, Dawe A, Moto FC, Dzeufiet PD, De Waard M. Antipyretic and antinociceptive effects of Nauclea latifolia root decoction and possible mechanisms of action. Pharm Biol. 2011;49(1):15-25. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2010.492479, PMID 20822326.

9.     Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drugs. 2nd ed, Business Horizons, pp; 2007. p. 2-14.

10.   Kokate CK. Vallabh Prakashan. 4th ed. 1994. Ed. Practical Pharmacognosy; 112:120.

11.   Roopashree TS, Dang R, Rani SRH, Narendra C. Antibacterial activity of antipsoriatic herbs: cassia Torá, Momordica charantia and Calendula officinalis. Int J Appl Res Nat Prod. 2008;1(3):20-8.

12.   Olajuyigbe OO, Afolayan AJ. Phenolic content and antioxidant property of the bark extracts of Ziziphus mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronata Willd. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11(1):130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-130, PMID 22176659.

13.   Niazi J, Gupta V, Chakarborty P, Kumar P. Antiinflammatory and antipyretic activity of Aleuritis moluccana leaves. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2010;3(1):35-7.

14.   Nagaveni P, Kumar KS, Rathnam G. Phytochemical profile and antipyretic activity of Mangifera indica. JITPS. 2011;2:167-73.

15.   Zakaria ZA, Wen LY, Abdul Rahman NI, Abdul Ayub AH, Sulaiman MR, Gopalan HK. Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic properties of the aqueous extract of Bauhinia purpurea leaves in experimental animals. Med Princ Pract. 2007;16(6):443-9. doi: 10.1159/000107749, PMID 17917444.

 

 

 

 

Received on 12.10.2021       Modified on 18.11.2021

Accepted on 15.12.2021     ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Res.  J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics.2022;14(2):63-68.

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5836.2022.00010